- Home
- Search Results
- Page 1 of 1
Search for: All records
-
Total Resources3
- Resource Type
-
0000000003000000
- More
- Availability
-
21
- Author / Contributor
- Filter by Author / Creator
-
-
Das, Ashmita (3)
-
Selfa, Theresa (3)
-
Cordoba, Diana (2)
-
Velardi, Sara (2)
-
Wonneberger, Anke (2)
-
Anthony, Raymond (1)
-
Bauchspies, Wenda (1)
-
Blue, Gwendolyn (1)
-
Harrison, Rebecca (1)
-
Henke, Chris (1)
-
Jin, Shan (1)
-
Kendig, Catherine (1)
-
Kristiansen, Silje (1)
-
Kuzma, Jennifer (1)
-
Lipschitz, Forbes (1)
-
Richter, Kurt (1)
-
Ruelle, Morgan (1)
-
Silberg, Timothy (1)
-
Takahashi, Bruno (1)
-
Thompson, Paul B (1)
-
- Filter by Editor
-
-
& Spizer, S. M. (0)
-
& . Spizer, S. (0)
-
& Ahn, J. (0)
-
& Bateiha, S. (0)
-
& Bosch, N. (0)
-
& Brennan K. (0)
-
& Brennan, K. (0)
-
& Chen, B. (0)
-
& Chen, Bodong (0)
-
& Drown, S. (0)
-
& Ferretti, F. (0)
-
& Higgins, A. (0)
-
& J. Peters (0)
-
& Kali, Y. (0)
-
& Ruiz-Arias, P.M. (0)
-
& S. Spitzer (0)
-
& Sahin. I. (0)
-
& Spitzer, S. (0)
-
& Spitzer, S.M. (0)
-
(submitted - in Review for IEEE ICASSP-2024) (0)
-
-
Have feedback or suggestions for a way to improve these results?
!
Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher.
Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?
Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.
-
Free, publicly-accessible full text available December 1, 2026
-
Kendig, Catherine; Selfa, Theresa; Thompson, Paul B; Anthony, Raymond; Bauchspies, Wenda; Blue, Gwendolyn; Das, Ashmita; Harrison, Rebecca; Henke, Chris; Jin, Shan; et al (, Journal of Responsible Innovation)An inclusive and socially legitimate governance structure is absent to address concerns over new agricultural biotechnologies. Establishing an agricultural bioethics commission devoted to inclusive deliberation on ethics and governance in agricultural and food biotechnology is urgent. Highlighting the social and ethical dimensions of current agricultural bioengineering disputes in the food system, we discuss how a nationally recognized policy forum could improve decision-making and increase public understanding of the issues. We clarify ways the concepts that are used to categorize food and frame governance of food affect consumer choices, and how dissemination of information and the mode of dissemination can contribute to social inequities. We cite the record of medically-oriented bioethic commissions and the history of international bioethic commissions in support of our argument, and end by discussing what such a commission dedicated to agriculture and food issues could reasonably be expected to achieve.more » « less
-
Das, Ashmita; Cordoba, Diana; Kristiansen, Silje; Velardi, Sara; Wonneberger, Anke; Yamaguchi, Tomiko; Selfa, Theresa (, Public Understanding of Science)Sociotechnical imaginaries of gene editing in food and agriculture reflect and shape culturally particular understandings of what role technology should play in an ideal agrifood future. This study employs a comparative media content analysis to identify sociotechnical imaginaries of agricultural gene editing and the actors who perform them in five countries with contrasting regulatory and cultural contexts: Canada, Japan, New Zealand, the Netherlands, and the United States. We find that news media in these countries reinforce a predominantly positive portrayal of the technology’s future, although variations in which imaginaries are most mobilized exist based on the regulatory status of gene editing and unique histories of civil society engagement around biotechnology in each country. We argue that by granting legitimacy to some narratives over others, the media supports gene editing as a desirable and necessary component of future agrifood systems, thereby limiting consideration of broader issues related to the technology’s development and application.more » « less
An official website of the United States government
